The defendant is God. The charges are many, but the most serious is ‘crimes against humanity.’ Discrete charges include genocide, hate mongering, inciting war, demonization of others, the rape and victimization of the innocent, and dehumanization (the destruction of human reason). A problem for the prosecution is that the defendant cannot be delivered to court, and there are serious doubts about his actual existence.
Some prosecutors thus invoke RICO, to show a broader pattern of corruption. Here, God is viewed as the Boss of a crime family, to be tried in absentia. God’s underboss, consigliere, capos and soldatos can be brought to trial, and indeed some have perpetrated terrible crimes—and are now doing time. On the other hand, intense investigation has revealed that some of the family members live profoundly good lives, as even the prosecutors recognize. Some spend their lives giving to others, seeking nothing for themselves.
In the long history of this crime family, even some underbosses have comported themselves in saintly fashion. Yet even these ‘good capos’ do the work of the Boss, and he is, so the case goes, the source of hellish malice. That he allows some good work to be done in the community—caring for the little old ladies once in awhile to maintain image—should not allow us to forget that he is a master criminal, intent on destroying all of his adversaries. He would be quite happy to use a WMD, if he gets his hands on one.
Defense attorneys have called character witnesses to show that God’s fundamental goodness is revealed in the making and staffing of hospitals, caring for the poor, championing justice, and the creating the dynamics that power civilizations. Parts of the trial have been marked by intense cross-examination, with images of brutal killing, dismemberment, and rape being countered by images of healing, love for enemies, and extraordinary compassion.
Yet another innovative defense strategy claims that God may not be tried, since he is creator of all, and thus surpasses justice. This legal brief claimed that only God’s own testimony could count as evidence of divine guilt. Some prosecutors have found old, hand written notes in which God does in fact express remorse and guilt. There’s even a curious recurring episode—found in three of the central families: the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic, where the Boss tries and in one case succeeds at having the underboss killed. Defense attorneys and prosecutors alike see this is probative evidence, but they differ in regard to its meaning. Prosecutors see it as evidence that the Boss is as morally corrupt as they have been alleging, but defense attorneys see it as evidence of the Boss’s moral goodness.
|Image courtesy of Ondřej Žváček|
via Wikimedia Commons
In light of these extraordinary circumstances, a world-wide jury has been convened to hear the case. It’s a sad fact that many jury members showed up to the trial with their minds already made up—some believing the Boss was guilty, and others believing that he was innocent. But not all. Some arrived to trial expecting to deliberate on the basis of evidence presented.
Join the trial. Court is in session.